返回文章列表
Fast Company

Are you preparing or procrastinating?

When you face a challenge, how do you know how much effort to put into solving it?  How do you determine whether you’re preparing or procrastinating?  When I was 21, I got sick with a complicated and poorly understood illness. After seven years homebound and bedbound, I got test results that suggested a surgery might be able to cure me. The problem? No good surgery existed.  I was neither a surgeon nor a doctor, but I was unwilling to live sick if there was a chance I could be well. So I decided I would invent the surgery and convince someone to give it to me. But to take on the challenge, I needed to figure out how to know when I was ready to pitch the idea to surgeons.   To do this I developed a tool: the cost of trying.  The cost of trying is the preparation it takes to put out a best effort. Some tasks are low cost of trying; others are high. The most powerful way to use this tool is to combine the cost of trying with the cost of failure and plot them, low or high. When you do that, you have a two-by-two matrix, and it reveals the strategy most applicable to your task. Plotting the Costs and then Plotting Your Course 1. Low cost of trying, low cost of failure: repeat action If you determine that the cost of putting out a best effort is low and the cost of failure is also low, then taking repeated action is your best path to achieving your goal.  When I was developing the surgery, the quintessential low-cost-of trying activity was searching for medical papers on some aspect of adrenal surgery. Even if the search came up empty, the only cost was the effort it took. Eventually, that’s how I got my first big break. After a year of looking, I found a single page from an online Georgia State lab manual explaining how to do the surgery I needed on rats. It wasn’t a solution, but now I had momentum. If your task falls within quadrant 1, keep trying until you succeed. 2. High cost of trying, low cost of failure: try early This is the “move fast and break things” quadrant. It’s where much of tech lives. When the cost of trying is high but the cost of failure is low, your best bet is to try early. You want to try early to see if you can succeed while also avoiding some of the preparation associated with a best effort. Don’t let “perfect” be the enemy of “good.” Beta testing for an app or feature is one example of trying early. So is iterating with your audience on a product, and so is preselling a book or online course.   3. High cost of trying, high cost of failure: preparation This is the high-stakes quadrant. Meticulous preparation can set you up for success, but anything less steers you toward costly failure. The preparation quadrant can feel like it’s the toughest to manage, but it’s not. Preparation gives you a strong way to influence the outcome, so you’re not helpless, you’re just taking on a lot.  4. Low cost of trying, high cost of failure: speculation One word best describes the risky tasks here: speculation. Think Russian roulette: a grim game of chance where the cost of failure is death. Preparation does little to bend the odds in your favor. There’s no way to mitigate the risk if the cost of trying is low and the cost of failure is high. Unsurprisingly, this is a no-go zone for most things.   So, when does it make sense? Two situations come to mind.  The first is when you have a new insight. If the world sees the task as high cost of failure with no way to avoid the risk, but you devise a way to prepare, then you push the task into preparation. The 1979 MIT Blackjack Team did this when they figured out how to count cards in casinos and to consistently beat the house.  The second situation is if the payoff is high and you can easily weather the loss. This describes a lot of the venture capital world. They expect a series of failures to cost them millions, but they hold on until they find the success that makes them billions. Long odds pay off big-time if you win, and if you can afford the loss, sometimes it can be a competitive advantage. The-Cost-of-Trying Matrix Helped Me Persevere and Win I used this tool to help save me when I faced my life’s biggest challenge. I realized I was in quadrant 3: high cost of trying and high cost of failure. I needed to prepare, and prepare some more. So I did. It took me four years to develop the surgery and build the medical team to undertake it.  My surgery was a success; it was eventually done on both of my adrenal glands. I got my health back, and the surgery is now the standard of care at several hospitals for a related rare disease. You don’t have to wait until your life is on the line to use this matrix. Plot your to-do list and work tasks onto it. Once you do, you can be confident you’re spending your time taking action when it’s most advantageous and preparing when it’s most necessary.

收藏邮箱

AI 分析

标题洞察

标题用“Are you preparing or procrastinating?”制造了一个很强的自我审问感,天然适合引发点击和转发,因为它把模糊的拖延焦虑变成了一个可判断的问题。这个标题的传播力在于“二选一”的冲突结构,很适合改写成中文的判断句式,比如“你是在准备,还是在拖延?”“努力到位了吗,还是只是在自我安慰?”这类标题尤其适合知识科普、职场效率、自我管理和创业内容。

核心观点

文章的核心是:不要笼统地谈“要不要努力”,而要先判断一件事的“尝试成本”和“失败成本”,再决定是反复行动、尽早试错、充分准备,还是干脆避免冒险。作者用四象限把“准备”和“拖延”区分开来,强调很多时候不是你不够努力,而是你选错了策略。文章最有观点价值的地方在于,它把个人决策从情绪层面的“我是不是懒”转成结构化判断,边界也比较清楚:如果信息不足,就不能把所有拖延都归因于执行力。

创作启发

可以写成“如何判断自己是在准备还是在拖延”的实用方法文,用四象限图直接做成图文、短视频或直播讲解,降低理解门槛。也可以结合职场场景延展成系列选题,比如“做方案前要准备到什么程度”“哪些事适合先上线再优化”“哪些项目不能轻易试错”。如果做内容账号,还能把这个框架改造成读者自测清单,让用户用自己的待办事项逐条判断,增强互动性和收藏价值。